4 Comments
User's avatar
Rod Adams's avatar

Chris - Like China X-Energy hit the ground running with the help of tech transfer from Germany. They hired a substantial portion of the HTGR technical team when South Africa put that project into a long hiatus.

X-Energy may not have much construction experience, but Dow is the licensee and will be the power plant constructor. X-Energy is the technology supplier.

X-Energy received a $1 B addition to its cash war chest. That’s a powerful development tool.

You’re correct in pointing to the importance of the refueling system. It’s an area worth watching.

David Phillips's avatar

So 11 billion is an immodest amount of money to develop a new reactor? I get you are doubtful, doubtful, wary. But what are you writing this for? Investor protection? You believe that 13 years is super fast for a reactor development? Much of the reactor can be tested without turning it on. If allowed to turn on, a reactor can be built and destroyed after a year. Then reconstructed. It is a carefull “stewardship” of resources that prevents this, not something inherently dangerous. With enough resources a space-X approach is possible.

Chris Keefer's avatar

This is a great deep dive on the category error of “Space X-ing” nuclear. https://whatisnuclear.com/news/2025-02-25-a-nuclear-startup-will-probably-not-be-the-next-spacex.html

Nakup Lepton's avatar

I think that TRISO will not be the biggest technical hurdle, good luck containing the helium pressurized to about 6 MPa (about 60 atmospheres).

https://info.ornl.gov/sites/publications/Files/Pub196359.pdf

Titans of Nuclear had an episode about helium cooled reactors.

Nuclear Technology Series: High Temperature Gas Reactors

https://www.lastenergy.com/titansofnuclear/miniseries