5 Comments
User's avatar
David Strozzi's avatar

With all its virtues, why isn't CANDU a larger share of the global nuclear fleet?

The Impact of AI's avatar

Interesting! the fuel sovereignty argument is the one that doesn't get enough attention in Western nuclear policy discussions. Every country running a light water reactor is dependent on enriched uranium fuel from a handful of suppliers, a supply chain vulnerability that looks very different post-2022 than it did before. CANDU's ability to run on natural uranium, fabricated domestically, with no enrichment dependency is a geopolitical asset as much as an engineering one. That alone should be a serious factor in Ontario's technology decision, independent of the cost comparison with AP1000.

Phil M.'s avatar

Another great episode. Just yesterday Atkins Realis submitted a Notice of Intent to the NRC for pre-application licensing process for its CANDU reactor technology in the United States. Could get interesting.

Scott Newell's avatar

Yes. If only more Canadians knew how great our nuclear reactors and uranium industry is !

In typical Canadian fashion none of this is Promoted and Celebrated!

smopecakes's avatar

The Korean APR-1400 may be the best western competitor to the Candu, with early builds of the AP-1000 seemingly guaranteed to cost a lot. Unlike the AP-1000 the APR doesn't have similar passive cooling characteristics - making the Candu the clear front-runner for me